
First Monday Musings By Dean Vik Amar: Why We In Legal Academia Should Assist In Legal Journalism, But Do So Carefully
Legal academics can and should help educate the public about the law.
Legal academics can and should help educate the public about the law.
It's a complicated mix of arguments about substantive policy, procedural thoroughness, and outside perception.
Position your firm for long-term growth with better financial visibility and control. Learn how to track performance, manage spending, and plan strategically—download the full e-book now.
Dean Vik Amar analyzes one proposal to protect free speech on campus.
It's a tale of the (relatively) good, the (pretty) bad, and the (downright) ugly.
How can law schools be less insular with regard to teaching? Here are three ideas from Dean Amar.
Dean Amar comments on the big news out of the ABA Midyear Meeting today.
Here’s What The Best Ones Are Doing Differently.
A legal education is a major investment; some modest level of paternalism ought not to be rejected out of hand.
How much does the Supreme Court matter in the big picture?
There's a lot to keep law school deans busy over the summer.
In light of how high bar-exam stakes are today, we need to ask some basic questions about this crucial test.
Is your firm keeping up with legal finance and tech trends? The 2025 Legal Industry Report shows how firms optimize cash flow, automate payments, and use AI. Download now for key insights.
Some of Judge Posner's points are clearly correct; in other cases, the situation is more complicated than he seems to appreciate.
Dean Vikram Amar offers advice to law students about how to show their stuff come exam time.
Please welcome our newest columnist, Dean Vikram Amar of the University of Illinois College of Law, who will be writing about legal education.
Vikram Amar of Illinois Law explains why he's excited about his new job and outlines his priorities as dean.
Finally! The Supreme Court's long-awaited rulings on gay marriage in California and the Defense of Marriage Act. What did the Court rule?